The Warhead Cable Test Dilemma

move 1According to Kohlbergs honourable using theory, Stanton Wong honorable development should be at post-conventional level, where it is believed that caring for former(a) is everyones obligation. It is because he is concerning with the puff up world of the innocent civilians and the military resultant role if a improper missile misfired. Beside that, he in like manner entailing a manner of solving the bother so that everyone is cared for as and nobody will molested by the faulty air.For Harry Jackson, he stage of object lesson development is at the pre-conventional level. At this level, self-concern is emphasized and set are adhered to in order to avoid punishment and also be rewarded. It shag be turn out by his intentionally to ignore the consequent of the product run and do non take action to correct the line of work. It is because he does not think of the well being of the civilians and military mortalnel because he to a greater extent worries virtual ly fillting punishment from higher(prenominal) up if the warhead cable bevel be deliver on conviction to the customer. From here we can see that he emphasis on his self-interest more than the values of other tribe.Question 2I think Stanton Wong should line the probe issuance to the customers witnesser inspector, Jane Conway first and enquire Jane to perform additional sample examination. I think it can help to allure Harry Jackson to stop the cable for shipping out for the customer if Jane ground out there is a bother occurred on the cable. If Harry still eliminate to cream the problem, then Stanton should report the drive to the top care who have the cater to change Harrys decision. One of the ethical ratiocination is logic, it means before we can abstain or make a thought , we have to ensure that premise, either literal or inferred, are know and clear.In this case, I think it is logical for Stanton to report the problem to authorities if the faulty items cou ld harm innocence and also because he cares about the civilians and armed forces. Accuracy is one of the ethical reason out, it means whatever evidence cited to financial backing our judgement should be accurate, relevant, and complete. So, before he reports to top management, he should ask the source inspector to run additional test to ensure the previous test result is accurate and certainly. The other criteria of ethical reasoning is consistency. It states whatever decision a person made or action taken should consistent with his or her moral values. Thus, Stanton should makes a decision that does not contrary with his moral values.Question 3Currently, I think he should not be a whistle-blower. Because there are several methods to exculpate this problem internally,such as informing the problem to top management and thus he should not involve public media in solving this problem. Beside that, he should considers his role as an employee. As a employee, his role is creating value s for the attach to or help the political party the achieve its goals. If he blows the whistle on his own attach to, it will defame the partnership plus he might get fired or distrust by his colleagues. At the meantime, it might consider wrong to be a whistle-blower because it doesnt draw any positive values for company and may against the conducts as an employee. In addition, the effect may cause to the company if the poop concern a company safety valve out is always out of estimation, so he should not risk his travel and the fame of his company since there are other methods can be use to solve this problem.Question 4The company already have the protocol in testing and reporting of product tests. The company could severely punish those who do not constitute the protocol to avoid this kind of situation. In additional, the company should be careful when hiring the build motorcoach. They should hire someone with dependable moral values such as money plant and sincerity. Beside that, they should make sure the plant manager is broad-minded, and with good interpersonal or people management skills. It can help to check this kind of situation because a open-minded manager able to listen to advices or opinions and making wise decision establish on evidences.Beside that, a manager with good interpersonal or people management skills could enhance the performance of the employees and this increase the fictitious character of the product. Furthermore, I think the company can give the quality control executive program the power to stop or queue the production if product failure occurred. It is practically costly to reproduce the product when it was finished. Thus, the company should allow the quality control supervisor to find out and solve the problem instantly without waiting further instruction from plant manager.